성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
1. Defendant A and B shall be punished by imprisonment for 8 months, by a fine of 2,00,000 won, respectively.
2. Defendant C and D.
Punishment of the crime
1. Defendant A, as the owner of “G” located in Busan Metropolitan City’s annual system, was equipped with the facilities, from April 30, 2012 to October 12, 2012, such as a bed room 9, a hot-water room 7, and operated a bed.
At around 00:30 on October 12, 2012, the Defendant employed the female employees of H, etc. at the above business establishment, found in the above business establishment, received 170,000 won as the price of sexual traffic from the customers who were receiving 170,000 won as the price of sexual traffic, and led H, etc. to do sexual intercourse with the customers.
In addition, the Defendant arranged sexual traffic from April 30, 2012 to October 12 of the same year by the same method.
2. Defendant B is the head of the department responsible for the place of the above massage practice.
On April 30, 2012, from October 12, 2012 to October 2, 2012, the Defendant provided guidance to customers who found to engage in sexual traffic in the massage procedure at the place of sexual traffic, as well as aiding and abetting the act of arranging sexual traffic of A by managing employees.
3. Defendant C is an employee of the above massage procedure.
From June 2012 to October 12, 2012, the Defendant aided and abetted the act of arranging sexual traffic of A by guiding customers who found sexual traffic at the place of the massage procedure for sexual traffic to the smuggling, which is the place of sexual traffic.
4. The same defendant is employed by the above massage practice establishment.
On October 9, 2012, from October 201 to October 12, 2012, the Defendant aided and aided the act of arranging sexual traffic by guiding the customers who found in the massage place to engage in sexual traffic in the said massage place to the smuggling, which is the place of sexual traffic, and bringing about the case and the case to the customers.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendants’ respective legal statements
1. The police suspect interrogation protocol of H;
1. Each statement of I, J, K, L, and M;
1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the records of seizure and the list of seizure;
1. Article applicable to criminal facts;
A. Defendant A: the Act on the Punishment of Arrangement of Commercial Sex Acts.