Project approval and announcement 1) Project Name: B Construction Project (5th)

(2) Public notice of Defendant 3: The Central Land Expropriation Committee publicly notified on June 29, 2009 (hereinafter “instant expropriation adjudication”) on October 28, 201 by October 28, 201, publicly notified by the Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs.

(1) From the starting date of expropriation: Compensation for losses and obstacles caused by the closure of the livestock industry operated by the Plaintiff (3) on December 21, 2011: 151,328,320 won [130,720,000 won (119,920,000 won (20,600 won) for losses caused by the closure of the business, and 20,608,320 won)] (hereinafter referred to as “the appraisal of the instant case”) as a result of the appraisal of the operating profits of the appraisal corporation (hereinafter referred to as “the appraisal of the instant case”).

(A) Ordinary Appraisal Corporation: 120,800,000 won for Scenic Appraisal Corporation: 120,800 won for 120,000 won for Scenic Appraisal Corporation; 20,000 won for 120,00 won for 【No dispute exists; Gap’s 1,2, and Eul’s 1 and 2; and the Plaintiff’s assertion as to the overall purport of the pleadings; 1) The Plaintiff’s assertion as to the overall purport of the Plaintiff’s livestock industry closure

The judgment of acceptance of this case, although "the daily profit evaluation method" should be applied using the formula of "the average number of the maternity amount 】 the annual amount of production of the maternity amount 】 the shipping body of the sexual amount 】 the average sales unit 】", the judgment of acceptance of this case simply calculated the operating income by the method of calculating each two sales income of the maternity amount and the non-land amount. ② In calculating the annual income of the non-land amount 2009 to 2009 to 2009, not the last three years, as of the date of acceptance decision, there was an error calculated based on 2007 to 2009, not the last three years from 2009 to 201, which is calculated based on the date of acceptance decision. Accordingly, the judgment of acceptance of this case is unreasonable because the amount of

Therefore, it seeks to increase the amount of compensation for operating income of this case.