[2017 Highest 1998] On August 14, 2017, the Defendant: (a) discovered the victim E (64 tax) who was frequently disputed at Bupyeong-si D convenience stores in Bupyeong-si, Bupyeong-si; (b) found the victim’s face, etc.; and (c) caused injury to the victim, such as a hole and fix on the left side, if the victim was aware of the need for approximately two weeks of treatment; and (d) caused injury to the victim.

[2017 Highest 3051] On October 8, 2017, the Defendant heard, under the influence of alcohol, the horses that “any weather spaws have reported,” that “Is any weather spaws have been frighted by the people around Schlage,” who had received 112 reports from the slope H belonging to the Taecheon-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City Police Station G District, the Defendant called up for 112.

The police officer, the police station, the police officer, or the police officer;

“A large number of times, hacks, and h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h., the h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h, and the h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h h

As a result, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

[2017 Highest 1998]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police for E;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. On-site photographs, damaged photographs of victims, and damaged photographs of victims (2017 high group 3051);

1. Legal statement of the defendant (as at the date of the eight public trial, in the case of the defendant);

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A written statement of I;

1. Application of photographs, the 112 Reporting Processing List, CCTV video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of injury), Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties) and the choice of imprisonment for each crime;

1. The grounds for sentencing under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment of Concurrent Crimes, and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the records, such as age, occupation, sex, sex, family relationship, living environment, circumstances leading to the crime, and circumstances after the crime.