도로교통법위반(음주운전)
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Records] The Defendant received a summary order of KRW 700,000 from the Daejeon District Court on March 30, 2007 to a fine of KRW 700,000 as a crime of violating Road Traffic Act (drinking) in the support of the Daejeon District Court.
7. 13. The same court has received a summary order of KRW 3 million due to a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act.
[2] Although Defendant 1 had been able to violate Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act more than twice as above, Defendant 2 driven B food cars under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.150% in the 700 meters away from the 700-meter section of the blood alcohol level to the road in the south-gu Cheongdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City on September 16, 2018.
Summary of Evidence
1. Statement by the defendant in court;
1. Notification of the results of regulating drinking driving;
1. Statement report and investigation report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business (report on the situation of the driver at the main place of business);
1. Previous convictions in judgment: References to inquiries, such as criminal history, investigation reports (reports on attachment of criminal records of the same kind as the suspect), and application of each text of summary order attached thereto;
1. Relevant legal provisions and Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the selection of punishment for a crime, and the selection of imprisonment;
1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;
1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act for orders to provide community service and attend lectures have already been punished for the crime of drinking alcohol driving on two occasions: Provided, That the defendant's wrong recognition and reflects the defendant's wrong recognition, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment heavier than the fine, and the defendant's age, sex, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc. shall be determined as the same as the order.