When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On May 6, 2015, the Defendant made a false statement to the effect that, in front of a complex terminal run in the Dong-dong, Daejeon, Daejeon, the Defendant would send a 60,000 mobile phone to the victim C ( South, age 250,000 if he remitted KRW 460,00,00) by accessing the Internet “Internet” website by using a mobile phone, despite the Defendant’s intention or ability to sell the mobile phone.

The Defendant, by deceiving the victim as such, was transferred KRW 460,00 to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant at around 17:59 on the same day from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police interrogation protocol to the accused;

1. Article 347 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime, Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment shall be considered as favorable circumstances. However, the sentencing data revealed in the records, such as the fact that there are many criminal offenders of the same kind and different types, the fact that damage has not been repaid, the fact that damage has not been repaid, and other circumstances before and after the crime, shall be determined as ordered.