2. It is recognized that the judgment of the defendant recognized each of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake, the defendant agreed with the victims, and the defendant's economic situation as a recipient of basic living benefits is not sufficient.

However, each of the crimes of this case is that the defendant interfered with the main business and caused injury to the main employees for about two weeks in consideration of several times, and the case is not less and less severe. In particular, the defendant committed each of the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents before being sentenced to the suspension of the execution of two years of imprisonment due to the violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, etc., and the defendant committed the crimes of this case without being aware of the fact that he was sentenced to a large number of criminal offenses related to violence, during which he was sentenced to the suspension of the execution, and has the history of being sentenced to the suspended execution, and other various circumstances, including the defendant's age, environment,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the ground that it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.