A. On June 30, 1975, the transfer registration for ownership of Non-Party Q, R, and S 3 (each equity 1/3) was completed on July 22, 2008 with respect to the 1/3 portion of net Q on the ground of “the inheritance on March 12, 2004,” the ownership transfer registration was completed with respect to the 1/3 share of the designated parties F, G, H, I, and J (each equity 1/15) under the name of the Mayor/Do governor (each equity 1/15) and the ownership transfer registration was completed on August 27, 2008 with respect to the portion of the deceased Q 1/3 share on the ground of “the inheritance on March 12, 2004” under the name of the Mayor, G, H, I, and J (each equity 1/15).

B. Meanwhile, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of Nonparty U on July 23, 2010 on the ground of “sale by compulsory auction on June 28, 2010,” among the forest land of this case, on the ground of the “sale by compulsory auction on June 28, 2010,” and the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Plaintiff on December 6, 2011. Of the forest land of this case, the registration of ownership transfer was completed in the name of the Defendant B on October 9, 2012 with respect to the portion of 1/15, which is part of Defendant A’s 1/6 shares.

C. On May 17, 2006, the deceased, as heir, died of K and children, L, M, Defendant C, Selection, N,O (HV but was changed to the current name on August 14, 200), and P.

[Evidence] Facts without dispute between the parties, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 4, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination as to Defendant C’s defense prior to the merits

A. First, the above defendant is not a co-owner of the forest of this case since the non-party net R, Appointer F, G, H, I, J, Defendant A, B, and P are only registered on the registry of the forest of this case. Defendant C, Appointer K, L, M, N,O, and P are not registered, and the forest of this case is not a co-owner of the forest of this case. In addition, the forest of this case is a real estate trusted by the intervenor of the defendant's assistant clan in title trust to the network R, and it cannot be deemed that the shares of the network R are transferred to Defendant C, Appoint, etc.