보험금
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant in excess of the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked and above.
1. The reasoning of the court of first instance for the acceptance of the judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the submission, addition, or deletion of the following:
2. Parts used for cutting, adding, or deleting;
A. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the second instance stated “5,625,00 won” as “5,624,530 won”.
B. Of the judgment of the first instance court, “ October 29, 201,” the first written judgment of the first instance court, the first written judgment of the first instance, read “Wesday on October 29, 201” and “self-harm” of the second written judgment, respectively, shall be deemed to read “injury.”
C. Of the judgment of the first instance court, each of the acts No. 8 and No. 20 of the acts No. 5 and No. 6 shall be described as "within 180 days" respectively.
Of the judgments of the first instance court, the following shall be added to the "attached Table 1 (Attachment Table 1 Standard Table for Payment of Insurance Money)" in Part 26 (Attachment 1):
"Standards: Amount of insurance coverage: 10 million won."
E. The following shall be added to the judgment of the first instance court in accordance with Section 24 of the first instance judgment.
In particular, in the case of the insurance contract 2 of this case, if the grade of the disability is not determined within 180 days from the date of the disaster, the grade of the disability shall be determined on the basis of the disability diagnosis as of the 180th day from the date of the accident as of the date of the 180th day. Therefore, the Plaintiff’s disability grade shall be determined in accordance with the C Hospital D's written opinion, medical certificate (Evidence 5, evidence 6 evidence 1, 201), and medical certificate (as of October 29, 201), not from the date of the accident of this case (as of October 29, 201).
F. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the term “instant healthy life insurance contract” in Part 25 of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed to be “instant 1 insurance contract,” and the term “instant workplace life insurance contract” in Part 4 of the 10th judgment shall be deemed to be “instant 2 insurance contract,” respectively.
G. 2 of the judgment of the court of first instance
B. The part of the defendant's argument is as follows.
B. The defendant's assertion that this case's insurance contract of this case interferes with the plaintiff's claim.