beta
(영문) 부산지방법원 2020.06.24 2019나2565

물품대금

Text

1. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part against the Plaintiff, which orders additional payment, shall be revoked.

Reasons

1. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of the pleadings in each of the statements in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 7 (including each number), as to the cause of the claim, the plaintiff may recognize the fact that the plaintiff supplied fishery products to the defendant from before 2013 to April 12, 2018, and the fact that the plaintiff was not paid for the goods equivalent to the following amount from the defendant:

- Account payable for the portion supplied from 2013 to 8 October 2013: 4,960,000 won to 4,960,000 won from March 5, 2015 to September 29, 2017: Amount payable for the portion supplied: 8,262,00 won from October 13, 2017 to 12, 2018: 6,145,000 won: 19,367,000 won (the Plaintiff is evidence related to the instant transaction) as evidence; 1.0% of the account books related to the instant transaction from 19,367,00 won (the date, quantity, unit price, and cumulative balance from 200,000 won continuously and mechanically recorded with the Defendant; 2.1.0% of the account books cited by the Defendant to 30% of the final amount of KRW 9,500,000,0000, total of the account books accepted by the Defendant 16.