beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2018.09.06 2017구합583

관세부과처분취소

Text

1. The defendant's "date of disposition" in the attached disposition list shall be attached to the plaintiff on the date stated in the attached disposition list.

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, from September 15, 2015 to May 16, 2016, imported the Cheongdo Export and Import Limited Corporation, a Chinese exporter, from the Cheongdodo Export and Import Limited Corporation (Sao Ad Ex. Co., Ltd., Ltd.), and filed an import declaration with the same content as that stated in the unit price, column, etc. for the attached disposition report.

(2) If the Plaintiff’s duty return price for the instant goods is based on the attached Form No. 30(4) and the Plaintiff’s duty return price for the instant goods, “The amount stated in the column for column for column for column for column for column for column for column for Annexed Taxation,” which is the transaction price adjusted by adding transportation costs, etc. to the reported unit price for the instant goods. The Defendant, as indicated in the attached Form No. 1, shall select the goods as similar goods of this case (hereinafter “the instant comparative goods” in the attached Form No. 1, hereinafter “the instant comparative goods”) produced from Chinese Magra, Inc., which entered within 30 days before and after the date of entry into the instant goods, as indicated in the attached Form No. 30(5) and then examine whether the declared unit price for the instant goods is appropriate, on the basis of which the reported unit price is clearly different from the transaction price of the goods of this case selected as similar goods and the materials submitted by the Plaintiff alone cannot be resolved with reasonable doubt about the accuracy or truth of the declared unit price for the instant goods.”