However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Notwithstanding that the Defendant is not a person handling narcotics:

1. On June 1, 2014, around 16:50, from the Defendant’s home located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, approximately 0.03 grams of psychotropic drugs (tentatively referred to as “copon”; hereinafter referred to as “copon”) sent from C (48 years of age, south) known to ordinary people at the Defendant’s home located in Gangseo-gu Busan Metropolitan City, and accepted them without compensation;

2. At the same time and at a place as referred to in the preceding paragraph, water was stored in a single-use injection machine and dilution was administered in such a way as to injection into his left arms.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Copy of the protocol concerning the examination of suspect C by the prosecution;

1. Records of seizure and the list of seizure;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to written appraisal;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1), and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. concerning the relevant criminal facts;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37 and Article 38 (1) 2 of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Probation and community service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of final sentence due to the mitigation area (6-1 year and 6 months), mitigation area (6 months), mitigation area (8-1 year and 6 months), mitigation area) of Type 2 (the scope of recommending punishment), the mitigation area (8-1 year and 6 months) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc.) (the scope of recommending punishment), the mitigation area (6-1 year and 6 months) of Type 3 (the scope of recommending punishment), the mitigation area (6-1 year and 6 months), the mitigation area (6 months), the mitigation area (6 months), the special mitigation area) of important investigation co-offenders of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc.: The fact that there is no previous sentence in August-2 and March (the decision of sentencing) of 203, the fact that there was no previous sentence after August-203, the arrest of the upper line C, the fact that phone medication was visible even after the voice was taken in the urine test, etc.