However, considering the circumstances revealed in the reasons for sentencing and the conditions of sentencing indicated in the record, the sentencing is not recognized to be unfair (Defendant B, an accomplice, mainly engaged in the instant sexual traffic business, and the Defendant was in the role of assisting him.

The argument is asserted.

However, in light of the criminal history of Defendant B and the relationship with A, etc., the role of Defendant B in the instant crime was less than A.

The reason for the reduction of punishment cannot be recognized because it is difficult to see it.

All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.