However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 24, 2019, the Defendant: (a) around 21:35 on December 24, 2019, around 21:35, the Defendant: (b) moved the patrol box to B while making the instant disposition upon receiving a report from a taxi engineer E that the Defendant did not pay the taxi expenses; and (c) the police officer C sent the patrol box to B while carrying out the instant disposition.

The Defendant was re-dominated by the police officer, who tried to get out of the police station while moving patrols and intending to get out of the scambling and scambling his sexual organ, and tried to expose the citizens to the sexual organ again and to see the scam.

Accordingly, the Defendant, while intending to take the face of the chilled D with his hand while driving the chilled D with his hand, and assaulted the chilled D with the chilled part of the right side of the chilled D, which was beyond the floor, by generating the chilled part of the chilled part of the chilled part of the chilled part.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of police officers' duties on 112 reported duties.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of violence victim photographs;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crimes and Article 136 of the Election of Imprisonment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Social Service Order Criminal Act [Incompetence] and the fact that the Defendant committed the instant crime by taking advantage of the following circumstances: (a) there is no criminal record of suspended execution or more; (b) reflects the fact that there is no criminal record of a suspended execution or more; and (c) his family members want to have the Defendant’s wife