1. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant H’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court’s determination that the Defendant was guilty of the facts charged on the grounds indicated in its reasoning is justifiable, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, there were no errors by misapprehending the legal doctrine

2. Examining the reasoning of the lower judgment as to Defendant I’s ground of appeal in light of the evidence duly admitted by the lower court, the lower court is justifiable to render an additional collection of KRW 2,100,000 against the Defendant on the grounds indicated in its reasoning, and contrary to what is alleged in the grounds of appeal, the lower court did not err in

In addition, the argument that there is an error in the misapprehension of legal principles as to the recognition of illegality in the judgment below is not a legitimate ground for appeal, as it is alleged in the ground of appeal that the defendant did not consider it as a ground for appeal or that it was not subject

In addition, under Article 383 subparagraph 4 of the Criminal Procedure Act, only in cases where death penalty, life imprisonment, or imprisonment or imprisonment without prison labor for not less than ten years has been imposed, an appeal on the grounds of unfair sentencing is allowed. Thus, in this case where a more minor sentence has been imposed on the defendant, the argument that the sentencing of the

3. Therefore, all appeals are dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.