When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On January 13, 2017, the Defendant was faced with economic difficulties due to lack of living costs in the Defendant’s residence located in the window of Changwon-si, Changwon-si, and even if the Defendant did not own the goods and received money from the injured party, he did not intend to sell the money, but did not have the intent or ability to sell it, the Defendant sold merchandise coupons on the NAB Kak-si’s car page.

“On the same day,” written the content, and on the same day, it received KRW 1,620,00 from the victim B to the Defendant’s Saemaul Depository Account (C) in the name of the Defendant, and acquired it by defrauding it, and also received money through the above method through the above three times in total from that time to December 23 of the same month, such as the statement in the list of crimes attached hereto, from that time.

Accordingly, the defendant acquired 4,170,000 won in total from three victims.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each written petition and each written statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the transfer receipt, each sales notice, the Stockholm dialogue content, the content of text dialogue, and the detailed statement of transaction;

1. Relevant Article 347 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting a crime and Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, including the same kind of criminal record and one time, have been punished several times, and any damage has not been recovered.

On the other hand, the defendant recognizes the crime of this case and is not subject to criminal punishment more than suspension of qualification.

In addition, the punishment as ordered shall be determined by comprehensively taking into account various conditions of sentencing as shown in the records and arguments, such as the attitude of the accused to participate in the trial (one trial date, one time the sentencing date, and two times the sentencing date), the number of victims and the amount of damage, the age, sexual conduct, environment, details, motive, means and consequence of the crime, circumstances after the crime, etc., and the like.