The Defendants did not pay each of the above fines.

On March 4, 2016, around 19:50, the Defendants ordered the F main point located in the 1st floor of the business building E in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si to enter the customer, and ordered the female employees to have a froude, but refused to do so, the Defendants left the victim H (48 tax) who was the head of the frof, and went against the frof while resisting the frof., and the Defendant B resisted the beer with the victim and the female employees. Defendant A frofed the beer at the vicinity of the krobb, with the invoice, and flabed the victim’s flab with the victim’s flab, and Defendant C sustained the victim’s flab with his hand and sustained the victim’s flab with the victim’s flab, and followed the victim’s flaf, and subsequently Defendant A and C did not jointly with the victim’s flaf.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A photograph of the fluor of the course of the assault;

1. Application of CCTV-related Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 2 (2) 1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act concerning the crime, Article 2 of the Act on the Punishment of Violences, etc., Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, based on the following factors: (a) the Defendants appeared to have led to confession and reflect on the instant crime; (b) the degree of assault is relatively minor; and (c) the Defendants’ age and other circumstances under Article 51 of the Criminal Act, etc. are determined as indicated in the Disposition.