When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is the driver of the PP vehicle B, and the victim C (67 years and remaining) is the manager of the D commercial building.

On June 15, 2017, the Defendant: (a) operated a vehicle owned by the Defendant at the front of the parking entrance of the parking lot for the front of the Gu government around 23:30, and (b) operated a vehicle at the front of the parking lot for the purpose of calculating the fees on the underground parking lot more than the thought of the charges on the Do, which was damaged by making the front screen of the parking lot for the parking lot.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A statement of damage;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;