However, for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive, the above sentence shall be executed.

Defendant

B From October 30, 201 to May 28, 2014, a person who was the representative of “Co. E” (hereinafter referred to as “E”) that mainly engages in the business of management, incidental business, group cultivation, etc. of agriculture, and Defendant A is the representative of “F” (hereinafter referred to as “F”) that mainly engages in the production of micro-organisms.

On January 2013, the Defendants agreed to apply for a subsidy program referred to in the item of "G business" to the effect that "the subsidized business operator is supplied with sacrhos on condition that he bears 50% of the sacrine price, sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrines and sacrines 50% of the sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrines are remitted directly to the sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrine sacrines," which

From June 13, 2013, the Defendants submitted to the above J a detailed list of transactions in the name of F to the purport that he supplied the satisfafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafafabafabafafafabafabafafabbafafafabbabbag in the name of Defendant B and I in the name of Defendant B, Defendant B and I, and deposited the FJ in the name of F in the name of F, 2000, 6000.

As a result, the Defendants conspired in collusion and deception the above situation.