When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

[2015 High Court Decision 2017Da1577] The Defendant opened a cell phone in the name of the injured party B with the victim’s resident registration certificate, his husband C’s resident registration certificate, and post office passbook (Account Number:D).

1. On September 11, 2012, the Defendant forged private documents: “B” in the name column for confirmation of subscription, “K”, “K” in the resident registration number column, “C” in the bank name column, “C” in the account number column, “D”, “C” in the resident registration number column, “C” in the deposit number column, “C”, “C” in the customer registration number column, “C” in the “C”, “C”, “C” in the “CP62,” “LE2,” “B” in the “B” column, “B9,800,” and “B” in the “P” column, “20,000,000,000,000” in the “P” column, “20,000,000,000,000,000 or more” in the “P” column, “1,000,000,000 or more” column “each month.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a new service contract in the name of private document B, which is a private document on rights and obligations.

2. The Defendant at the time, place, etc. specified in paragraph (1), and at the same time and place, had F know of the forgery, but not knowledge of the forgery (hereinafter “SK Telecom”).