When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

The defendant is a person who arranges a vehicle in which the cargo is loaded.

On August 12, 2015, the Defendant introduced that the victim E is a non-accidentd vehicle with 120,000 km from food D in 2010, which is being displayed within C, as a vehicle with no problem.

However, the above vehicle was disposed of on May 18, 2015, and the cost of KRW 18,422,800 was paid from the insurer.

As such, the Defendant, as if he was a normal vehicle, deceiving the victim as if he was a victim of the accident vehicle, received a total of KRW 5.3 million from August 12, 2015 to August 20, 2015 from the victim, and obtained a delivery of KRW 5.3 million from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each police statement made to F and G;

1. A complaint filed by E;

1. Investigation report (as against the front side of the vehicle):

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to register the performance inspection of used cars, which are financial transactions in the principal, a summary of information on history of secondhand accidents, and the performance inspection of used cars

1. Article 347 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 347 of the choice of punishment;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;