성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (defendant A: imprisonment of one year, two years of suspended sentence, and fine of 5 million won; community service order for 80 hours and community service order, additional collection of 30 million won, Defendant B: fine of 6 million won) is too uneased and unreasonable.
2. In light of the following: (a) there is no particular change in the sentencing conditions compared to the lower court’s determination; and (b) there are various sentencing conditions indicated in the instant records and pleadings, the lower court’s punishment seems unfair. Therefore, the Prosecutor’s aforementioned assertion is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed under Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and it is so decided as per Disposition (Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and Subordinate Statutes, which is applicable to the law of the court below, is "Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and Subordinate Statutes, such as Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts," and "Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act" of Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and subordinate statutes, which is "Article 19 (2) 1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and subordinate statutes, such as Mediation, etc. of Commercial Sex Acts," and Article 62 (2) 4 and 5 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts and subordinate statutes of the court below, since it is obvious that it is each clerical error of "1. suspended execution (Defendant A)" (Article 62 (1) and (2)