However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 5, 2019, the Defendant was issued a summary order of KRW 2 million due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act in the Suwon District Court's Ansan Branch for a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Although the Defendant violated the provision prohibiting drunk driving as above, on September 2, 2020, at around 03:40, the Defendant driven a F bargaining car under the influence of alcohol concentration of about 0.067%, over a section of about 2 km from the roads near C Hospital located in G in the same city to the roads near E stations located in D in the same city.

Accordingly, the defendant violated the prohibition of drinking driving more than twice.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Report on the state of state of drinking drivers, and notification of the results of the regulation of drinking driving;

1. Previous convictions indicated in judgment: Application of criminal history records, inquiry reports, and Acts and subordinate statutes attached to the same type of power;

1. Relevant Acts concerning facts constituting a crime and Articles 148-2 (1) and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act which choose the penalty;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Taking into account the risks inherent in drinking driving under the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act, the blood alcohol density (0.067), driving distance, and the same criminal records (2019), taking into account the following factors: (a) driving under drinking twice during the period of suspended sentence of crimes; (b) the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime; and (c) the sentence shall be determined as per the disposition, taking into account the following factors: