2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On July 18, 2012, the Plaintiff entered the Republic of Korea on July 18, 2012, and applied for refugee status to the Defendant on August 14, 2012.

B. On January 17, 2014, the Defendant rendered a disposition of non-recognition of refugee status on the ground that the Plaintiff’s assertion does not constitute “a well-founded fear that would be prejudicial to persecution” as a requirement of refugee under Article 1 of the Convention on the Status of Refugees and Article 1 of the Protocol on the Status of Refugees.

(hereinafter “instant disposition”). C.

On February 20, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an objection with the Minister of Justice on February 20, 2014, but the said objection was dismissed on September 26, 2014.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 6 (including virtual number), Eul evidence 1 and 2, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Whether the instant disposition is lawful

A. The plaintiff's assertion that he had a good relationship with the opa-Sababa because the pastors, who had followed by the plaintiff, from the time when he did so as to study the Islamic doctrine as a hydropasa, had a lot of novels against the opa-saba and the students to criticize the opa-saba. He worked for the opa-saba of the opa-gu organization. From November 2001 to the above organization and the opa-sababa, the fighting occurred between the above organization and the opa-saba, and the opa-saba died.

In around 2007, there was a case in which a Simpha-mopians were dissatisfied with a Simpha-mopians, and the Simpha-mops thought that the plaintiff was related to the above case, reported the plaintiff to the police falsely, and the police tried to arrest the plaintiff several times around February 2007.

Even after August 2011, the Plaintiff had been threatened by telephone from a opto-secte several times.

In addition, Pakistan has continued terrorist acts by reason of the leth century.