When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. On July 17, 2014, at around 18:10, the Defendant: (a) expressed a desire to avoid paying the said victim’s loans to the D restaurant operated by the victim C in Gangseo-gu Busan, Busan; (b) returned to the restaurant; (c) was in contact with the said victim with a device containing the device; and (d) was spazing the Spaz; and (c) was spazing the Spaz; and (d) was frighting the victim with the desire to take a part in the restaurant for about one hour, thereby hindering the victim’s restaurant operation by avoiding disturbance for about one hour.

2. At the above time and place, the Defendant is a person who is a victim E, who is an employee of the above restaurant, on the ground that he/she speaks for himself/herself.

The Defendant, while she was able to see the face, left hand, etc. in a sound, she was flicked, she was flicked, she was flicked, and she was flick, and she was flicked when she was flick on the left side in a new flick.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each police statement protocol against C and E;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Relevant Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 260 of the Criminal Act, the choice of fines for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 186 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act involving Costs of Trial;