2. The judgment of the court below recognizes all the criminal facts and reflects the depth of the defendant, and agreed with the victim who interfered with his duties at the court below, and deposited KRW 50,000 for the victim police officers at the court below. However, it is recognized that the nature of the crime in this case is not good in light of the contents of the crime in this case. The defendant has been punished several times for similar crimes, and the defendant has committed the crime in this case during the suspended execution period due to the same crime, and there is a high risk of recidivism in light of the defendant's tendency after drinking, and other various circumstances, which are the conditions for sentencing as shown in the records, such as the defendant's age, sex and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, and the circumstances after the crime, are considered, considering that the defendant suffers from mental illness, and it is not unfair for the court below's punishment to be too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.