업무상횡령등
As to the crimes No. 1 and No. 2 of the judgment of the defendant, imprisonment with prison labor for not less than six months and for the crimes No. 3 to 10 of the judgment, three years and six months.
Punishment of the crime
On July 3, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of one-year imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on July 11, 2013, and the judgment became final and conclusive on July 11, 2013. On March 27, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two-year imprisonment with prison labor for embezzlement in the same occupational court on March 27, 2015 and the judgment became final and conclusive on April
1. The Defendant, as the representative of “H” corporation on the seventh floor of Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Building, has been engaged in the business of transferring study funds from parents to designated banks of foreign universities while arranging study abroad.
A. On April 2, 2012, the Defendant received KRW 4,595,00,000 from the victim I to the bank account (number:K) of the Defendant’s name and used it for personal purposes, such as operating expenses of H, etc. around that time.
Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the property of the victim while on duty.
B. On May 24, 2013, the Defendant: (a) received tuition fees of KRW 5,373,00 from the injured party to the account in the name of the Defendant from the J on May 24, 2013; and (b) used KRW 5,373,00 for personal purposes, such as operating expenses of H, etc. around that time.
As a result, the Defendant embezzled the victim’s property while on duty (at least, 2016 ancient group 2078). 2. The Defendant, as the representative of “H” from the seventh floor of the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government G Building, has been engaged in the business of arranging studying abroad and remitting the funds to a designated bank of a foreign university.
While the Defendant was commissioned by L to proceed with the U.S. study process from M, his children, the Defendant passed another school if he added the first school expenses to “the Univs of the Univ who passed the first school” to the victim around January 25, 2013.