However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

From November 25, 2010 to November 24, 2011, the Defendant worked as policy assistant (contract assistant) in B Si administration and C Team (hereinafter “C Team”). From November 25, 2010 to November 24, 201, the Defendant was in charge of the business affairs that E, who is the department in charge of the business affairs related to D and reported to B Mayor by reviewing the matters that he/she was promoted or is being promoted in connection with D business, and on October 29, 2010, the Defendant commissioned L Law Firm as a special adviser for D business affairs. On October 13, 2010, the Defendant concluded a legal advisory service agreement with L law firm with L law firm and the existing part-time payment method.

In addition, on December 17, 2010, F Co., Ltd. submitted an application for provisional disposition to determine the status of the partially completed person to the Suwon District Court against B Si, and E and E tried to appoint Law Firm L and respond to the action for provisional disposition. However, from November 25, 2010, the defendant, who started work as policy assistant officer, asserted the change of the litigation performer and eventually selected law firm I and H attorney as the litigation performer. In light of this, it can be seen that the defendant led the main decision-making related to D business.

D Around November 10, 2010, “F Co., Ltd.”, the executor of the D business, filed an application for partial completion of the D business, but rejected from B, filed an application for provisional injunction against B on December 17, 2010 to determine the status of partial completion confirmation, etc., and filed an application for international arbitration against B, with the International Arbitration Court affiliated with the Hong Kong International Commercial Conference located in the Hong Kong, against B on February 18, 201.

On March 8, 2011, B, the City decided to select an attorney to perform the above international arbitration on behalf of B, as a selective competitive bidding method, and accordingly, the E and G belonging to the above E and G: the price, 50, 20, 20, 20, and 20, respectively.