The defendant shall pay 75,800,000 won to the applicant for compensation by deceit.

3.2

The Defendant is a person who operated a real estate brokerage office with the trade name of “E” on Seoul D 1st floor, and a “F” office on the second floor.

1. On August 20, 2009, the Defendant committed the crime against the victim G, at the Defendant’s house located in Seongbuk-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H, and at the victim’s home, contacted the victim G to pay the victim the interest on the third part of each month until he/she fully pays the money. When it is necessary to pay money, he/she shall pay the principal at any time in advance at any time until he/she fully pays the money.

However, while the Defendant did not have any particular property or income, the Defendant did not have any intention or ability to repay the existing debt to the victim even if he did not borrow money from the victim due to the failure of the existing debt collection sales.

Accordingly, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, received KRW 10 million from the victim as the borrowed money and acquired it through the agricultural bank account in the name of the Defendant, around August 24, 2009, and acquired it through deception, as well as from September 19, 2012, by obtaining KRW 29 million in total over 29 times in the same manner as the list of crimes in the attached crime list from September 19, 2012.

2. On January 1, 2012, the Defendant committed the crime against the Victim I, saying, at Seongbuk-gu Seoul Fhop office, the Defendant called the Victim I by phone to the Victim I, that “I want to live the E real estate, and will complete payment after one month of lending money.”

However, at the time, the Defendant was expected to use the money received from the victim to repay the principal and interest of the existing debt, and there was no real estate that can expect profit margins, etc., and there was no particular property or income. On the other hand, there was no intention or ability to repay the existing debt even if the previous debt was reached at several billion won, and even if the said premium was insufficient to borrow money from the victim.

Accordingly, the defendant deceivings the victim as above and belongs to it.