도시관리계획입안제안신청반려처분취소
1. On July 9, 2012, the Defendant’s disposition to revoke the Plaintiff’s application for drafting an urban management plan against the Plaintiff.
2.
1. Details of the disposition;
A. The Plaintiff underwent a final inspection on the completion of an urban planning facility project on March 201, and thereafter operates a marina club (hereinafter “instant golf club”) located in 529 Won-ri, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (hereinafter “Seoul Special Metropolitan City”).
Within a decision (change) on urban management planning (a change): The location of a business for expanding a marina club: 1,825,080 square meters in the area of 529 square meters in the area of 1,825,080 square meters in the area of the project in the area of the Dong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Incheon-si (204,004,631.3 square meters in the area of 820,448.7 square meters in the area): Golf membership: 18 square meters in the membership system of the golf course; 18 square meters in the public; 18 square meters in the area of 18,449 square meters in the public; 75,449 square meters in the area of 741,64 square meters in the area of the planned management area of the land incorporated into the planned management area that can be installed; - The area of the land incorporated into the planned management area of the sports facilities (private ground): 6 lots 1,004,631.32 square meters in the area of the area of the land (excluding the area of the land)
B. On November 2, 2011, the Plaintiff: (a) additionally constructed 820,448.7 square meters on and around the 18-year membership golf course; and (b) extended the instant golf course to 1,825,080 square meters on and around the 1,004,631.3 square meters on and around the existing 18-year membership golf course; and (c) proposed a proposal to the Defendant to formulate an amendment to an urban management plan with the following content, by changing the extension of the instant golf course, which is an urban planning facility, and the specific use area of land to be newly incorporated on the site
(hereinafter referred to as “instant draft proposal”). C.
Upon consultation with relevant departments and relevant agencies, the Defendant requested the Plaintiff to supplement the proposal of this case on several occasions, including November 29, 201 and January 25, 2012, and the Plaintiff submitted relevant supplementary documents at each time to the Plaintiff, which is faithful to the request for supplementation.