When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

At around 19:53 on April 8, 2016, the Defendant reported on 112 that “A” restaurant located in Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, and that “the Defendant is doing damage to her fluoring, snowing, and business,” and that the slope E belonging to the Suwon-nam Police Station D box, which was called out, returned to the Defendant who was in possession of in the said restaurant, returned to his house several times,” and took place at one time.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers on public peace and maintenance of order.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement of E and F;

1. G statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of victims;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and the selection of fines

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The grounds for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act reflects the defendant's mistake, the defendant has no criminal records of the same kind or suspended sentence, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim is considered as favorable circumstances. The defendant's age, character and conduct, environment, circumstances of the crime, and circumstances after the crime are considered as a whole, and the punishment as ordered shall be determined in light of the sentencing conditions indicated in the records.