In light of the fact that the defendant, despite having been punished for the same kind of crime, once again, deceiving the victim by the same method to commit the crime of this case, the degree of damage suffered by the victim by the crime of this case, and the recovery of damage has not been made up to the trial, the sentence of the court below seems to be appropriate.

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(However, it is clear that "65,931,662 won" in the 11st sentence of two pages of the facts constituting a crime in the first instance judgment is an error of "32,931,662 won", and thus, the judgment of the first instance is corrected in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure.