A Imprisonment of one year and six months, Defendant B's imprisonment of two years, Defendant C's imprisonment of ten months, Defendant D and E, respectively.

Defendant

A is a person who operates a printing office of the trade name “I” (hereinafter referred to as “I”) in Ilyang-dong, Manyang-si.

Defendant

On March 11, 2008, A entered into a lease agreement with the victim Republic of Korea (hereinafter “the instant lease agreement”) with the Defendant to use the leased principal amounting to KRW 93,00,00,00 in Japan, KRW 6 years in the lease term, KRW 5,935,00 in the lease term, KRW 13 to KRW 72 in the leased term, KRW 14,149,620 in each time, and KRW 14,149,620 in the lease term, and KRW 13 to KRW 72 in the joint and several surety.

When entering into the instant lease agreement, the injured party requested a new bank to issue a documentary credit, and the new bank issued an import documentary credit (USNCE) with a maturity of 360 days. Upon the expiration of the time limit for the said import documentary credit, the injured party repaid the documentary credit to the new bank on April 3, 2009, and as a result, notified the Defendant A that the lease deposit was changed to KRW 256,170,714, and monthly lease fee was changed to KRW 23,153,000, but the Defendant A did not agree to the change of the lease deposit, etc. and did not pay the lease fee.

Accordingly, the victim terminated the lease contract of this case on June 12, 2009 and requested the return of the printing machine of this case to the defendant A, and the defendant A refused to comply therewith, and the defendant A did not execute the execution of the provisional disposition by refusing the execution of the provisional disposition on the ground that the execution officer entrusted with the execution was different from the defendant A and B in the possession relationship of the object of the execution because the execution officer did not execute the provisional disposition on July 21, 2009, upon receiving the provisional disposition from the Cheongyang Branch Branch of the District Court on July 10, 2009 (2009Kadan50429).

1. The defendant A and B of the evasion of compulsory execution shall change the debtor;