However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, from May 28, 2007 to April 28, 2007, operated a public bath business with a total area of 693 square meters (200 square meters) and a public bath business, which is a public bath of “D”, with a business report to the Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Office. A person who operated an illegal massage treatment facility against customers by installing nine massage rooms on the side of a public bath and nine employees who are disqualified massagemen and employing them.

E, F, G, H, and I are employed by the defendant who is the employer in the above place and has engaged in an act of drinking to customers and receive 40,000 won per person and have engaged in an act of disqualified.

No person, other than a medical person, shall engage in medical practice, and engage in massage and massage business for profit without obtaining the recognition of qualification as a massage club from the Mayor/Do Governor.

Nevertheless, at around May 28, 2007, the Defendant, in collusion with the above E, etc., employed a total of 9 massage rooms on the side of a public bath to employ those who are unable to know the name of a massageman, and used them as employees. The Defendant, who received 8,000 won in cash (credit card 93,500 won) for an unspecified number of customers, received 8,000 won in cash per single hand against the unspecified number of customers, and engaged in massage activities in a manner of cutting down the body of customers by frighting them and stimulating them, and stimulating them by stimulating their frightening their frights, etc., with the aim of profit-making.

As can be seen, the Defendant conspired with those who are not aware of the foregoing E, F, G, H, I, and his name. From May 28, 2007 to March 16, 2013, the Defendant carried out sports massage business, which is an act of massage with an unspecified customer without qualification, for profit-making purposes, against the said unspecified customer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each protocol concerning the examination of police officers against I, F, H, G, and E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a business report, a statement of control, and a report on control of public morals;

1. Relevant provisions concerning facts constituting an offense;