However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for four years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 2, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 10:31, 2013, around 10:31, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house, e apartment 702, drinked alcoholic beverages in a single bitter, which had been located in the inside room without any justifiable reason, attached the fluor, and had it spread to the entire apartment 702 square meters of the size of the 110.16m2.

As a result, the Defendant: (a) destroyed all of the F-owned apartment bonds worth KRW 150 million at the market price of the Defendant and 5 members of F-owned housing; (b) destroyed them; and (c) thereby, suffered inhaled pictures that require approximately one week medical treatment to victims G (the 48 years old), H (the 22 years old), I (the 23 years old), J (the 45 years old), and J (the 45 years old), respectively; and (d) suffered the victim K (the 45 years old), L (the 43 years old), M (the 19 years old), N (the 12 years old), O (the 17 years old), and J (the 17 years old), respectively, for which the number of days of treatment cannot be known.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness P;

1. Each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the accused;

1. Each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Each statement of I, J, H, M, N, L, and K;

1. A written opinion and an investigation report (to be accompanied by a victim's K Family Opinion);

1. 화재감식 결과보고, 현장사진, 수사보고(녹취록 작성 보고) 피고인 및 변호인의 주장에 대한 판단 피고인과 변호인은 피고인이 이불에 불인 것은 사실이나 호기심에 불을 붙여 본 것일 뿐이고 곧바로 불을 껐으므로 피고인에게 이 사건 아파트에 방화할 고의가 없었다고 주장한다.

In other words, the following circumstances acknowledged by the above evidence are as follows: ① The apartment inside the apartment of this case was set up with materials that could easily move to the apartment of this case, such as electric flads, flads, flads, decoration, and coffee, and the defendant was actually set up with the entire apartment of this case. ② The defendant was set up with the 702 unit of the apartment of this case, and ② the defendant was set up with the flads in the inside of the age of 51.