beta
(영문) 인천지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고단134

특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On October 9, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and six months with prison labor for a violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) at the Gwangju District Court, on July 16, 2013, and was sentenced to six months for fraud at the Gwangju District Court, on November 19, 2014, and completed the execution of the sentence in Gwangju District Court on August 27, 2015.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a cuss car in C in violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Egressing Vehicle) and the Road Traffic Act (Egress after accidents).

On November 20, 2015, the Defendant driving the above vehicle at around 21:50, and driving the three-lane road in front of the Hyundai Apartment 106 Dong, which is located in 1269, in the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, along the direction of the original shooting distance, along the two-lanes in the direction of the backline.

In such cases, a person engaged in driving of a motor vehicle has a duty of care to care in the front and rear well, and to prevent accidents by properly operating brakes, steering devices, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to stop the vehicle and got the victim D(49) who was under the influence of the signal at the point where the accident occurred due to negligence, and led the victim D(49) who was under the influence of the vehicle driving by the Defendant, to the front part of the vehicle driven by the Defendant, and due to the shock, the Defendant got the victim F.I.D. (M. 35) who was under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle under the influence of the vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant, by such occupational negligence, was driving the victim H(50 years old), who was on the part of the victim H(50) driven by the victim D with the above occupational negligence in order to provide two-day medical treatment; the victim F with base salt, tensions, etc. in the chills that require two-day medical treatment; and the victim F with base-up car operated by the victim F.