If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

On March 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) around 06:30 on March 10, 2018, at the Sinnam-si, the Sinnam-si, the Defendant: (b) took a taxi operated by the victim D; (c) arrived at the destination; (d) did not comply with the demand from the victim to pay the taxi fee; and (c) did not comply with the demand from the victim; and (d) did so; and (d) did so, the Defendant was infinitely boomed by the victim to need to receive treatment for about two weeks from the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. Investigation report, receipt for settlement, the list of reported cases in 112, and photographs of the body of the victim;

1. The defendant and his defense counsel alleged that there was no injury to the victim because the defendant had already paid taxi expenses by the card, but did not go beyond the front door of the entrance. However, the victim, who is a taxi engineer, was unable to open the door and enter the house by the investigative agency up to this court, by stating in detail and in detail the reason and contents of the injury suffered by the defendant, "the defendant opened the door and went beyond the house, and went beyond the house," consistent with the statement, the situation of the statement is consistent with the rule of experience, and it is reasonable in light of empirical rule, the defendant did not report on the payment of the cost to the victim, and the defendant did not report on the payment of the cost to the victim, and the defendant did not report on the payment of the cost to the passenger, and the defendant did not report on the payment of the cost to the 1st passenger to the destination."

The police who stated in the investigation agency, and called out after receiving a report of 112.