A. Defendant B: (a) the real estate listed in [Attachment B] No. 2;

(b) Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J.

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association established to implement the Nanananan City M as a project implementation district, which is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project association established to implement the Nananan City M as a project implementation district. After obtaining authorization to establish the association from the astronomical City on July 24, 2006, the Plaintiff approved the management and disposal plan on April 3, 2015 pursuant to Article 49(2) of the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”), and the astronomical City announced the above management and disposal plan on April 13, 2015.

B. Defendant B owned the real estate listed in [Attachment 2] No. 2 in the said project implementation district, and the networkO owned the real estate listed in [Attachment 1] list in the said project implementation district. On May 19, 202, Defendant C, D, E, F, G, H, I, K, K, and L inherited the ownership of the said real estate.

C. According to Article 49(6) of the Act on the Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, when a management and disposal plan is authorized and its public announcement is made, a right holder, such as the owner, superficies, leasee, leasee, etc. of the previous land or building, shall not use or profit from the previous land or building until the date of public announcement of transfer under Article 54 of the Act on the Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents, and the project implementer may use or profit from the former land or building. Therefore, the Defendants whose use or profit has been suspended pursuant to the public announcement of the above management and disposal

2. Judgment on deemed confession (Article 208 (3) 2 of the Civil Procedure Act).