If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

At around 23:50 on September 26, 2012, the Defendant: (a) 23:50, the Defendant: (b) had the head of the Defendant and head of the drinking-dong, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul; (c) had the face of the victim C (the victim 21 years of age, south) who dried the crosswalk; and (d) had the victim C, who had a dispute over the crosswalk, said, “if there is a large number of years of age,” and had the victim c’s face taken several times of drinking, and had the victim D (the victim D (the victim 21 years of age, South) face at one time and two times of a defect in drinking in order to put the victim C at the face of the victim; and (d) had the victim D’s face at two times in the middle of the 68-1-day treatment for each six-day period.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Protocol concerning suspect interrogation of C;

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. Injury diagnosis certificates and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the facts constituting an offense (the point of being injured and the choice of a fine);

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act provides that the victims of the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Provisional Payment Order were relatively serious, but there was no record of punishment for the defendant, contingent crimes, and victims were paid a considerable amount of money from the defendant and did not want to be punished for the defendant, the punishment as ordered shall be determined in consideration of the fact that the victims did