The plaintiff is referred to defendant B, and the defendants are married with each other.

The Plaintiff owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet. As to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, and 3 (hereinafter “each of the instant land”) among them, the disposition No. 1 of the Defendant B’s name was made on November 7, 2016.

After the completion of November 9, 2016, the registration of transfer of ownership as stated in paragraph C was made on November 13, 2016, the order of the Defendant C’s name was made on the ground of the gift made from November 13, 2016.

The registration of transfer of ownership in paragraph (4) was completed on November 14, 2016, and each real estate listed in paragraph (4) of the attached list (hereinafter referred to as the “instant house”) is subject to the disposition of the Defendant C’s name, which was made on December 28, 2017 due to the gift made by December 28, 2017.

The registration of transfer of ownership in the port was completed on December 28, 2017.

Meanwhile, from April 12, 2016 to May 4, 2016, from June 12, 2016 to July 1, 2016, from July 5, 2016, from July 5, 2016 to June 27, 2017; and from July 13, 2017 to March 23, 2018, the Plaintiff was hospitalized in the form of tuberculosis vertebrate, low burine ma, etc.

In the meantime, Defendant B received and kept the Plaintiff’s passbook and seal imprint from the Plaintiff, and withdrawn the Plaintiff’s deposit using it and disbursed it to the Plaintiff’s hospital expenses, etc.

[Grounds for recognition] The plaintiff filed a claim for cancellation of ownership transfer registration under Gap evidence Nos. 1-1 to 4, and the purport of the whole pleadings, and the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendants with respect to each of the land and housing of this case was made arbitrarily by forging documents related to the plaintiff's possession of the plaintiff's seal imprint, although the plaintiff did not have donated each of the land and housing of this case to the defendants, or even if the plaintiff donated each of the land and housing of this case to the defendants, it is null and void as it was made under the plaintiff's business ability which was almost unknown. In addition, the defendants' registration of ownership transfer in the name of