The judgment below

Examining the reasoning in light of the relevant legal principles and records, it is justifiable for the lower court to reverse the judgment of the first instance that found the Defendant guilty on the facts charged of this case on the grounds stated in its reasoning that there is no evidence of crime

There is no error of law by exceeding the bounds of free evaluation of evidence in violation of logical and empirical rules, as alleged in the grounds of appeal, or by misapprehending the legal doctrine on “the body of another person who may cause sexual humiliation or shame” under Article 14(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes.

Therefore, the appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices on the bench.