However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

In early October 2007, the Defendant: (a) was asked by C, which was known to the Defendant, to have the name of the auditor of D Co., Ltd., operated by C, and was allowed to do so, and (b) was registered as the auditor of the said Co., Ltd. from the end of 2010 to the end of 2010; and (c) was actually working as an employee of the said Co., Ltd.; (d) on October 2007, the Defendant did not have money to receive goods from E Co., Ltd.; (e) by creating a false lease contract under the name of the Defendant, which was made in the name of the Defendant, to provide the contract as security, and to pay money after receiving the goods. Accordingly, upon receiving a request from the Defendant, the Defendant approved this.

After October 2007, C drafted a real estate lease agreement by using a computer at a place on which the Defendant and the Defendant conspiredd with a police officer on the first time, and entered into a real estate lease agreement (monthly rent). In the indication column of real estate, C stated in the deposit column as “Ffinite 103,00,000,000”, “40,000” in the deposit column, “39,60,000 won” in the remainder column, “39,60,000 won” in the remainder column, “39,60,000” in December 17, 2006, “206, G, resident registration number: H, name: I, telephone: and J: followed the I’s name prior seal.

On October 9, 2007, the defendant continued to prepare a transfer contract with a notary public in Seocho-gu Seoul, in order to receive the imported land from the director M of the company E, in order to transfer the above lease contract as security, and has notarized it, and presented as if the above forged real estate lease contract was duly completed to the employees of the above law firm office who are unaware of the forgery.

Accordingly, the defendant is about rights and duties for the purpose of exercising them in collusion with C.