However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On November 18:56, 2018, the Defendant: (a) stated that, “C” in front of the “C, which is located in Heungdong-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-si; (b) the police officers, such as the victim E(27 years old), who was called a policeman, who was dispatched after receiving 112 a report, paid the alcohol value to the Defendant; and (c) the police officers, who were the patrolmen belonging to the D Zone D District of the Cheongju Police Station, who called “I am home, I am home.” In doing so, the Defendant laid down the rank where the victim’s shoulders and the chests and the chests of the victim were pushed back, and continued to take on the left side of the victim, and caused the victim’s injury, such as a scarf, which requires approximately two weeks medical treatment.”

As a result, the Defendant committed an injury to the victim at the same time interfering with the police officer's legitimate performance of duties on handling 112 Reports.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to E by the police;

1. A written entrustment;

1. Application of the video CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., reflective facts of the suspension of execution);

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;