2. It is recognized that the judgment defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects it, and that the defendant has no record of punishment exceeding the punishment or fine imposed for the same kind of crime.

However, in order to eradicate the crime of this case, the act of aiding and abetting from the crime of this case, like the crime of this case, requires strict punishment. Of the amount of damage caused by the crime of this case, 11 million won was not recovered, and the defendant did not take measures for recovery of damage until the trial. There was no change in circumstances to change the punishment of the court below, and in full view of all the circumstances of the crime of this case including the records of this case and the changed theories, such as the character and environment of the defendant, how the crime of this case was caused by the crime of this case, how the crime of this case was committed, how money was withdrawn, and how the crime of this case was committed.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.