도로법위반
The defendant is not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the defendant shall be published.
1. On May 4, 2005, around 22:45, the Defendant violated the restriction on the operation of vehicles by the road management authority by loading and operating the freight exceeding the limited storage weight of D freight vehicles in relation to the Defendant’s business, at the location of the 18 km-gu Busan Business Office located in the direction of the Masan, the Nam-gu Office, a 18 km-gu, an employee of
2. Article 86 of the former Road Act (amended by Act No. 4920 of Jan. 5, 1995, and amended by Act No. 7832 of Dec. 30, 2005), which is the applicable provisions of the facts charged in the instant case, was declared unconstitutional by the Constitutional Court on Oct. 28, 2010, and accordingly, the said provision of the Act retroactively lost its effect.
Therefore, since the facts charged in this case constitute a case that does not constitute a crime, the defendant is acquitted under the former part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act, and the summary of the judgment against the defendant is publicly announced under Article 58(2)