When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. Forging a private document;

A. On May 2014, the Defendant prepared a loan certificate using a computer at the office D Co., Ltd. located in Kuju-si, and forged one copy of a loan certificate issued in the name of D Co., Ltd., a private document on rights and obligations, with the aim of exercising the seal impression of D Co., Ltd. by affixing a seal. In principle, “A”, “B”, “B”, “Won 270,000,000,” and “the repayment period shall be by April 20, 2014,” and “the interest shall be paid by 2.5 copies per month,” and “ January 9, 2014.”

B. On July 2014, the Defendant prepared a loan certificate using a computer at the office of the said D Co., Ltd., Ltd., and forged one copy of the loan certificate borrowed in the name of D, a private document, for the purpose of exercising the seal impression of D, with the intention of attaching the seal impression of D, with the following stated: “A”, “B”, “B”, “Won 36,000,000”, “Won 31 July 31, 2014,” “the repayment period shall be determined by July 31, 2014; and the interest shall be paid 2.5 copies per month; and “ July 8, 2014.”

2. On May 1, 2015, the Defendant filed a lawsuit claiming a loan with the Chuncheon District Court located in the Dong-si District Court in Seoul Special Self-Governing Province on May 1, 2015, and the said year.

5. 1. Around January 1, 201, two forged loan certificates were submitted to the employees of the above court as if they were duly formed.

3. On May 1, 2015, the Defendant, who attempted to commit fraud, filed a lawsuit claiming a loan against D, Inc. at the original district court located in the Dong-dong-si Seoul Special Metropolitan City Office, and submitted a loan certificate and an assignment order decision, etc. as evidentiary materials. However, among the above evidentiary materials, the Defendant was a forged document, as described in paragraph (1).

Nevertheless, the defendant is present at the seat.