However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 27, 2012, from around 22:50 to 23:20 on the same day, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business by drinking alcohol in the “D” restaurant under the care of the victim C, which is located in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Seocheon-gu, and taking the floor of the above restaurant entrance, and putting the victim “YY YY YY YY YYY YYYYYY YYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYYYY ACTYYYYYYYYYY

2. On October 27, 2012, around 23:25, at the same place as Paragraph (1) and at the same time, the Defendant was urged to return home from F, who was called up after receiving a report for the same reason as Paragraph (1), and the above F, “I will die, I will do so, I will do so,” and the Defendant considered F, as “I will do so, I will see that I will do so, I will see that I will do so, and I will see the police uniforms of F in good faith.”

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of police statement related to F and C;

1. Copies of identification cards of public officials;

1. A copy of the work log in the E district;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of the damaged part of police officers' outer posts;

1. Relevant Article 136(1) and Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e., Supreme Court Decisions 201Do144, Mar. 1, 2011>

1. Social service order under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act;