beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 평택지원 2014.08.06 2014고단690

상해

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On April 11, 2014, around 19:12, the Defendant inflicted injury on the victim B (the aged 51) who is a work partner in Pyeongtaek-si, Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju Jeju District, on April 11, 201, on the ground that the victim B (the aged 51) was not in his/her own wall and was not in his/her own wall. On the left part, the Defendant left the part of the victim's breast part of his/her left part of his/her breast part of his/her head one time with his/her left part of his/her head, and caused the victim to suffer injury, such as a dupage, including two cupages that require approximately six weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. B written statements;

1. Photographs of damaged parts;

1. A medical certificate of injury and an additional medical certificate of injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on CCTV image data;

1. Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act of the community service order;

1. Recommendations and sentences of the sentencing criteria (decision of types), group of violent crimes, general bodily injury, and type 1 (the scope of recommendations) (the scope of general injury) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for four months to one year and six months (the basic area, no special aggravation or mitigation exists);

2. It is so decided as per Disposition, in view of the circumstances unfavorable to the defendant, such as the injury suffered by the victim who was sentenced, and the failure to agree with the victim, etc., or the fact that the defendant recognized the facts charged in this case and appears to reflect his mistake, the fact that there was no record of punishment exceeding the fine due to the same error, the victim deposited KRW 2 million with the victim, and other circumstances shown in the records and arguments, such as the defendant's age, character and conduct, family environment, and circumstances after the crime, etc.