However, each of the above punishments shall be executed for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. Defendant B, on March 6, 2016, at the F parking lot office located in Seocheon-si, Nowon-gu, Seoul Special Metropolitan City (Seoul Special Metropolitan City) around 18:00, the Defendant: (a) carried a catf in the process of setting the game rules, and carried a cat of plastic material, which is a dangerous object behind the victim who spatizes the bat from the victim; (b) carried a cat of plastic material as his hand, and caused damage to the victim’s eye, ear, snow, etc., for about four weeks of treatment.

2. On March 6, 2016, Defendant A, on the ground that the victim was assaulted as set forth in paragraph (1) from the victim B, called the victim to get the victim to leave the above office in advance, and then, the victim’s hand and bucks, which are dangerous articles prepared in advance, were placed at the time of the victim’s hand and bucks, and the victim’s bucks and bucks were cut off to the victim for about 10 weeks due to the victim’s bucks.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects by the prosecution against the Defendants

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Deficial photo of an injury;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a certificate of hospitalization and a medical treatment register;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act) for mitigation of amount

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (Consideration favorable to the Defendants) is an unfavorable sentencing factor that the Defendants, as a reason for the suspended sentence, assaulted each other with dangerous articles, thereby causing serious injury.

However, the Defendants have accepted mutual agreement after the prosecution of this case, and Defendant A did not have the history of criminal punishment, and Defendant B did not have the record of being punished for violent crimes, and the Defendants resist their mistakes. As such, the above sentencing factors are recognized as favorable sentencing factors, such as the process and consequence of the crime of this case, and the circumstances after the crime.