A. When the Defendant came to know of the fact that the victim tried to hold an interview with his criminal case attorney while having good appraisal with the victim C, the Defendant was not guilty of the victim’s her husband. On June 10, 2012, the Defendant: “The head of C office, who is an employee of E, sent a phone call to D from the insular seat of the victim; “The head of C office, who was a male and female employee of E, got off the phone at the insular seat of her husband, was in transit to her husband, and he was still in transit to her husband, and he was not fully repaid to A. The male who got off the phone is a man who has not repaid 30 million won. The head of C’s phone call to E is denied, and the head of C office is called the head of C office.”

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out false facts.

나. 정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반 누구든지 정보통신망을 통하여 공포심이나 불안감을 유발하는 부호ㆍ문언ㆍ음향ㆍ화상 또는 영상을 반복적으로 상대방에게 도달하게 하여서는 아니 됨에도, 1) 피고인은 2012. 6. 14. 18:51경 불상지에서 피해자에게 “너 전화받어 A 이름 팔고 장난 쳤는데 양아치 행동 하지말고 전화받어 F사장 G 만나서 너 시아버지 찾아갔어 네 행동에 책임묻겠다 인격이 양아치 무슨 남의일 대행 너한데 무슨 자격으로 사채독촉하고 고발장넣겠다.”라는 내용의 문자메지지를 발송하였다. 2) 피고인은 2012. 6. 14. 19:01경 불상지에서 피해자에게 “내 이름 팔고. 장난쳤는 죄가 용서못하니 빨리전화죠라 수원으로 가기전 빨리전화 매일 찾아갈거다 아주 교활년 너 실랑이랑 사건 너무 잘아는데. F사장부인이라면. 아주 교활년이다 그정도뿐안되니. 그런 야비한 생동하지 아주나쁜년!!!”라는 내용의 문자메세지를 발송하고, 3 피고인은 2012. 6. 14. 19:42경 불상지에서 피해자에게...