2. It is recognized that the defendant repents his mistake.

However, the Defendant has not only been punished twice as a fine for the same crime, but also has the record of being punished twice as a fine for the same crime, the two times as a punishment for the same crime, the record of being punished once as a suspended sentence, the degree of injury is heavy, the damage was not recovered, the victim did not agree with the lower court, and there was no change of circumstances that could otherwise determine the Defendant’s age, sexual conduct, environment, motive, means and consequence of the instant crime, and the scope of recommended sentences of sentencing guidelines set by the sentencing committee of the Supreme Court, such as the circumstances after the crime, shall not be deemed to be unfair because the lower court’s punishment is too excessive.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.